Does Road Traffic Congestion Increase Fuel Consumption of Households in Kathmandu City?
Keywords:Road traffic, Congestion, Fuel consumption, Economic loss, Kathmandu, Nepal
The growth of vehicle and road traffic congestion is characteristics of urbanization and urban city and indicators of urban life in developing countries. In Nepal, non-economic factors and non-state factors have accelerated unexpectedly and haphazardly urbanization process, although the country was reengineered into seven provincial federal structure. In this backdrop, this paper empirically examines the growth of traffic congestion and its impact on urban households and livelihood based on 160 vehicle owners and users’ survey at six major traffic routes of two urban cities by applying mixed analytical methods (qualitative cum quantitative), descriptive statistics and multiple regression model. The descriptive statistics result of the study reveals nearly 94 percent acceptance level of vehicle owners and users about the growth of traffic congestion. Despite short distances of the road i.e. 2-4 kilometers and vehicle efficiency, the growth of traffic congestion increases 14036-liters fuel additional consumption. Per month, additional cost of fuel is estimated at 18,808 US dollars for a sum of distance i.e. 72,992 km between residence location and workplace each month. In the case of commuters, the estimation result of the study is 1188 hours of additional time loss with 6706 US dollars’ worth per month. The estimation of total economic loss is 25514 US dollars per month. Specifically, per month, economic loss of doctors and taxi drivers is 6556 US dollars but teachers and bankers have not economic loss.
ADB, 2010. Kathmandu sustainable urban transport project. (RRP NEP 44058-01). Kathmandu: ADB, https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/linked-documents/44058-01-nep-ea.pdf.
ADB, 2019. Nepal: Kathmandu sustainable urban transport project. Kathmandu: ADB, Retrieved from: https://www.adb.org/documents/nepal-kathmandu-sustainable-urban-transport-project.
Cambridge Systematics, 2008. Estimated cost of freight involved in highway bottlenecks. Office of Transportation Policy Studies, FHWA, US Department of Transportation.
CBS, 2011. Handbook of statistics. Central Bureau of Statistics, Kathmandu.
Gavanas, N., Tsakalidis, A., Pitsiava-Latinopoulou, M., 2016. Assessment of the marginal cost due to congestion using the speed flow function. Transport Research Procardia 24, 250-258.
Graham, D., 2007. Variable returns to agglomeration and the effect of road traffic congestion. Journal of Urban Economics, 62(1), 103-120.
Greenwood, I., Bennett, C.R., 1996. The effects of traffic congestion on fuel consumption. Road and Transport Research, 5 (2), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412299.0010
INRIX & Centre for Economics and Business, 2014. Traffic congestion to cost the UK economy. Retrieved from http://inrix.com/press/traffic-congestion-to-cost-the-uk-economy-more-than-300-billion-over-the-next-16-years/ on 3 Nov. 2015.
Joshua, A.O., Oni, l., Akoka, Y., 2008. A study of road traffic congestion in selected corridors of metropolitan Lagos, Nigeria Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, University of Lagos, Nigeria.
Kim, J., 2019. Estimating the social cost of congestion using the bottleneck model. Economics of Transportation, 19, 100119.
Kumarage, A.S., 2004. Urban traffic congestion: the problem and solutions, The Asian Economic Review, 2, 10-19.
Mao, L.Z., Zhu, H.G., Duan, L.R., 2012. The social cost of Traffic Congestion and counter measures in Beijing, presented in Ninth Asia Pacific Transportation Development Conference, June 29-July 1, 2012 | Chongqing, China.
MoF, 2019. Economic survey. Ministry of Finance, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Qi, M., 2016. Analysis on externality of traffic jams in Beijing-based on supply demand equilibrium, 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR, 2016).
Syarifullah, M., 2014. Jakarta traffic jam. Retrieved from:http://www.newcitiesfoundation.org/governor-ahoks-policy-to-solve-jakartas-traffic-jams/ on 4 Nov 2015.
UNDESA, 2014. World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (UNDESA) USA: UN.
WEF, 2020. The countries with the worst traffic congestion - and ways to reduce it. Geneva: World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/cities-congestion-brazil-colombia-united-kingdom/.
Weisbrod, G., Vary, D., Treyz, G., 2003. Measuring the economic costs of urban traffic congestion to business. Transportation research record, 1839(1), 98-106.
Weisbrod, G., Vary, D., Treyz, G., 2001. Economic implications of congestion. NCHRP Report #463. Washington, DC, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Raghu Bista, Surendra Paneru
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.