Residential Electricity Consumers and Increasing Block Pricing Policy in Pakistan: Evidence Based on Household Level Primary Data

Authors

  • Sania Malik Department of Economics, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Sargodha, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52223/jei3022103

Keywords:

Residential electricity consumption, Increasing electricity blocks pricing, Price elasticity, Household-level primary data

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the efficacy of increasing block electricity pricing (IBEP) which was imposed in 2013 by the Pakistani government. The main objective of this policy is rational resource allocation and to lower the cross-subsidization to the residential sector by two other major sectors such as commerce and industry. The study is based on primary data which is collected through questionnaires from four tehsils of district Sargodha in rural as well as the urban regions. About 54.6% of households understand the electricity price scheme (IBEP) while urban users are more aware as compared to rural but urban electricity consumption is higher due to high use of home appliances. By using the regression model the elasticity of residential electricity consumption is estimated for heterogeneous consumers. The upper blocks of electricity consumption are more sensitive to price increases (e.g., the elasticity of the first to fourth block is -0.391, -0.988, -1.229, -0.955 respectively) except in the fifth block (-0.489) which indicates that higher income group pays more attention to the standard of living. The increase in the number of trees also affects the price elasticity of residential electricity use and positively influences saving behaviour. The policy which was implemented from a welfare point of view has achieved its target to a certain extent. Future guidelines for the up-gradation of electricity pricing reform in the residential sector are thus proposed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Athukorala, P.P.A.W., Wilson, C., 2010. Estimating short and long-term residential demand for electricity: New evidence from Sri Lanka. Energy Econ. 32, S34–S40.

Bushnell, J.B., Mansur, E.T., 2005. Consumption under noisy price signals: a study of electricity retail rate deregulation in San Diego. J. Ind. Econ. 53, 493–513.

Chindarkar, N., Goyal, N., 2019. One price doesn’t fit all: An examination of heterogeneity in price elasticity of residential electricity in India. Energy Econ. 81, 765–778.

Cohen, P., West, S.G., Aiken, L.S., 2014. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology press.

Daioglou, V., Van Ruijven, B.J., Van Vuuren, D.P., 2012. Model projections for household energy use in developing countries. Energy 37, 601–615.

Druckman, A., Jackson, T., 2008. Household energy consumption in the UK: A highly geographically and socio-economically disaggregated model. Energy Policy 36, 3177–3192.

Du, G., Lin, W., Sun, C., Zhang, D., 2015. Residential electricity consumption after the reform of tiered pricing for household electricity in China. Appl. Energy 157, 276–283.

Feng, Z.-H., Zou, L.-L., Wei, Y.-M., 2011. The impact of household consumption on energy use and CO2 emissions in China. Energy 36, 656–670.

GoP, 2019. Economic Survey of Pakistan 2018-19, Wheat: ministry of food, agriculture and livestock division (Economic Wing), Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.

He, Y.X., Yang, L.F., He, H.Y., Luo, T., Wang, Y.J., 2011. Electricity demand price elasticity in China based on computable general equilibrium model analysis. Energy 36, 1115–1123.

Herriges, J.A., King, K.K., 1994. Residential demand for electricity under inverted block rates: Evidence from a controlled experiment. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 12, 419–430.

Huang, W.-H., 2015. The determinants of household electricity consumption in Taiwan: Evidence from quantile regression. Energy 87, 120–133.

Hung, M.-F., Chie, B.-T., 2017. The long-run performance of increasing-block pricing in Taiwan’s residential electricity sector. Energy Policy 109, 782–793.

Khanna, N.Z., Guo, J., Zheng, X., 2016. Effects of demand side management on Chinese household electricity consumption: Empirical findings from Chinese household survey. Energy Policy 95, 113–125.

Kim, H., 2019. Estimating demand response in an extreme block pricing environment: Evidence from Korea’s electricity pricing system, 2005–2014. Energy Policy 132, 1076–1086.

Krishnamurthy, C.K.B., Kriström, B., 2015. A cross-country analysis of residential electricity demand in 11 OECD-countries. Resour. Energy Econ. 39, 68–88.

Li, C., Song, Y., Kaza, N., 2018. Urban form and household electricity consumption: A multilevel study. Energy Build. 158, 181–193.

Maddock, R., Castano, E., 1991. The Welfare Impact of Rising Block Pricing: Electricity in Colombia. Energy J. 12, 65–78.

Miller, W., Senadeera, M., 2017. Social transition from energy consumers to prosumers: Rethinking the purpose and functionality of eco-feedback technologies. Sustain. Cities Soc. 35, 615–625.

Morris, P., Buys, L., Vine, D., 2014. Moving from outsider to insider: Peer status and partnerships between electricity utilities and residential consumers. PLoS One 9, e101189.

Nelson, J.P., Roberts, M.J., Tromp, E.P., 1987. An analysis of Ramsey pricing in electric utilities, in: Regulating Utilities in an Era of Deregulation. Springer, pp. 85–109.

Pielow, A., Sioshansi, R., Roberts, M.C., 2012. Modeling short-run electricity demand with long-term growth rates and consumer price elasticity in commercial and industrial sectors. Energy 46, 533–540.

Reiss, P.C., White, M.W., 2008. What changes energy consumption? Prices and public pressures. RAND J. Econ. 39, 636–663.

Stokke, A. V, Doorman, G.L., Ericson, T., 2010. An analysis of a demand charge electricity grid tariff in the residential sector. Energy Effic. 3, 267–282.

Sun, C., 2015. An empirical case study about the reform of tiered pricing for household electricity in China. Appl. Energy 160, 383–389.

Sun, L., Zhou, K., Yang, S., 2018. Regional difference of household electricity consumption: An empirical study of Jiangsu, China. J. Clean. Prod. 171, 1415–1428.

Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Yin, J., Zhang, Y., 2011. Determinants and policy implications for household electricity-saving behaviour: Evidence from Beijing, China. Energy Policy 39, 3550–3557.

Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Zhang, Y., 2012. Determinants of public acceptance of tiered electricity price reform in China: Evidence from four urban cities. Appl. Energy 91, 235–244.

Ye, B., Ge, F., Rong, X., Li, L., 2016. The influence of nonlinear pricing policy on residential electricity demand—A case study of Anhui residents. Energy Strateg. Rev. 13, 115–124.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-31

How to Cite

Malik, S. (2021) “Residential Electricity Consumers and Increasing Block Pricing Policy in Pakistan: Evidence Based on Household Level Primary Data”, Journal of Economic Impact, 3(2), pp. 80–87. doi: 10.52223/jei3022103.

Issue

Section

Research Articles
Bookmark and Share